a
/
gosora
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

avoid double indirect for header in simple_forum_check_pre_perms hook 

avoid double indirect for header in forum_check_pre_perms hook
use hookgen for forum_check_pre_perms hook
This commit is contained in:
Azareal 2020-05-26 11:46:02 +10:00
parent 480ff79d6d
commit 67772f2f9a
1 changed files with 24 additions and 8 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

32
common/routes_common.go
View File

@ -29,29 +29,29 @@ var SimpleUserCheck func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request, u *User) (heade
var UserCheck func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request, u *User) (h *Header, err RouteError) = userCheck
var UserCheckNano func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request, u *User, nano int64) (h *Header, err RouteError) = userCheck2
func simpleForumUserCheck(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request, u *User, fid int) (header *HeaderLite, rerr RouteError) {
header, rerr = SimpleUserCheck(w, r, u)
func simpleForumUserCheck(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request, u *User, fid int) (h *HeaderLite, rerr RouteError) {
h, rerr = SimpleUserCheck(w, r, u)
if rerr != nil {
return header, rerr
return h, rerr
}
if !Forums.Exists(fid) {
return nil, PreError("The target forum doesn't exist.", w, r)
}
// Is there a better way of doing the skip AND the success flag on this hook like multiple returns?
skip, rerr := header.Hooks.VhookSkippable("simple_forum_check_pre_perms", w, r, u, &fid, &header)
skip, rerr := h.Hooks.VhookSkippable("simple_forum_check_pre_perms", w, r, u, &fid, h)
if skip || rerr != nil {
return header, rerr
return h, rerr
}
fperms, err := FPStore.Get(fid, u.Group)
if err == ErrNoRows {
fperms = BlankForumPerms()
} else if err != nil {
return header, InternalError(err, w, r)
return h, InternalError(err, w, r)
}
cascadeForumPerms(fperms, u)
return header, nil
return h, nil
}
func forumUserCheck(h *Header, w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request, u *User, fid int) (rerr RouteError) {
@ -59,7 +59,15 @@ func forumUserCheck(h *Header, w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request, u *User,
return NotFound(w, r, h)
}
skip, rerr := h.Hooks.VhookSkippable("forum_check_pre_perms", w, r, u, &fid, &h)
/*skip, rerr := h.Hooks.VhookSkippable("forum_check_pre_perms", w, r, u, &fid, h)
if skip || rerr != nil {
return rerr
}*/
/*skip, rerr := VhookSkippableTest(h.Hooks, "forum_check_pre_perms", w, r, u, &fid, h)
if skip || rerr != nil {
return rerr
}*/
skip, rerr := H_forum_check_pre_perms_hook(h.Hooks, w, r, u, &fid, h)
if skip || rerr != nil {
return rerr
}
@ -230,6 +238,14 @@ func userCheck2(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request, u *User, nano int64) (h
if u.Loggedin && !u.Active {
h.AddNotice("account_inactive")
}
/*h.Scripts, _ = StrSlicePool.Get().([]string)
if h.Scripts != nil {
h.Scripts = h.Scripts[:0]
}
h.PreScriptsAsync, _ = StrSlicePool.Get().([]string)
if h.PreScriptsAsync != nil {
h.PreScriptsAsync = h.PreScriptsAsync[:0]
}*/
// An optimisation so we don't populate StartedAt for users who shouldn't see the stat anyway
// ? - Should we only show this in debug mode? It might be useful for detecting issues in production, if we show it there as-well