Add more docs

This commit is contained in:
Willian Mitsuda 2022-01-20 17:02:38 -03:00
parent 678ade4341
commit 8a523a39d5
1 changed files with 32 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Otterscan JSON-RPC API extensions
The [standard Ethereum JSON-RPC APIs](https://ethereum.org/en/developers/docs/apis/json-rpc/) are very limitting and in some cases non-performant for what you can do with an archive node.
The [standard Ethereum JSON-RPC APIs](https://ethereum.org/en/developers/docs/apis/json-rpc/) are very limited and in some cases non-performant for what you can do with an archive node.
There is plenty of useful data that can be extracted and we implemented some extra RPC methods for them.
@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ They are all used by Otterscan, but we are documenting them here so others can t
We take an incremental approach when design the APIs, so there may be some methods very specific to Otterscan use cases, others that look more generic.
## FAQ
## Quick FAQ
### Why don't you use _Some Product XXX_ for Otterscan? And why shouldn't I?
@ -26,11 +26,39 @@ Implementing everything in-node allows you to plug a dapp directly to your node
### But your API doesn't scale and it is slower than _Some Product XXX_!!!
Not everyone needs to serve thousands of request per second. Go ahead and use _Some Product XXX_.
Not everyone needs to serve thousands of requests per second. Go ahead and use _Some Product XXX_.
Some people just want to run standalone development tools and calculating some data on-the-fly works fine for single user local apps.
Even so, we may introduce custom indexes for some operations in future if there is such demand, so you may opt-in for a better performance by spending more disk space.
Even so, we may introduce custom indexes to speed up some operations in future if there is such demand, so you may opt-in for a better performance by spending more disk space.
### Wen PR upstream?
API design is hard and once it goes public you have to support it forever. For this reason we are primarily keeping it in our own fork and under a vendor specific namespace (`ots_`).
Also, the quality level of the current APIs differs, some are very generic, some are very Otterscan specific. Our API design has been driven mainly by Otterscan feature needs, which is a good thing (tm), so no useless features.
Having said that, we want to have people experimenting with our APIs, bringing other use cases, and driving the API evolution. If there are enough users vouching for a certain feature, we would gladly submit a PR to Erigon upstream repo.
The first step to achieving that is having this own page properly documenting our APIs so people don't have to look at our source code 😅.
Your feedback is important, please get in touch using our communication channels.
## How to use it?
They are all JSON-RPC methods, so your favorite web3 library _should_ have some way to custom call them.
For example, ethers.js wraps standard calls in nice, user-friendly classes and parses results into easy-to-use objects, but also allows you to do custom calls and get raw results while still taking advantage of their capabilities like automatic batching, network timeout handling, etc.
I'll use ethers.js as an example here because it is what I use in Otterscan, please check your web3 library docs for custom call support.
Let's call the `ots_getTransactionError` method to obtain the revert reason of a failed transaction. It accepts one string parameter containing the transaction hash and returns a byte blob that can be ABI-decoded:
```
const provider = ...; // Obtain a JsonRpcProvider object
const txHash = "..."; // Set the transaction hash
const result = (await provider.send("ots_getTransactionError", [txHash])) as string;
```
## Method summary