FAQ: fix single-buffer patch (249ef9)

rebase against master
This commit is contained in:
bakkeby 2020-06-10 21:02:22 +02:00
parent effc2107e4
commit 2c85b5da91
2 changed files with 15 additions and 12 deletions

23
FAQ
View File

@ -189,18 +189,18 @@ buffer.
diff --git a/x.c b/x.c
--- a/x.c
+++ b/x.c
@@ -561,10 +561,6 @@ xresize(int col, int row)
win.tw = MAX(1, col * win.cw);
win.th = MAX(1, row * win.ch);
@@ -732,10 +732,6 @@ xresize(int col, int row)
win.tw = col * win.cw;
win.th = row * win.ch;
- XFreePixmap(xw.dpy, xw.buf);
- xw.buf = XCreatePixmap(xw.dpy, xw.win, win.w, win.h,
- DefaultDepth(xw.dpy, xw.scr));
- XftDrawChange(xw.draw, xw.buf);
xclear(0, 0, win.w, win.h);
}
@@ -921,8 +917,7 @@ xinit(void)
/* resize to new width */
@@ -1148,8 +1144,7 @@ xinit(int cols, int rows)
gcvalues.graphics_exposures = False;
dc.gc = XCreateGC(xw.dpy, parent, GCGraphicsExposures,
&gcvalues);
@ -209,17 +209,18 @@ diff --git a/x.c b/x.c
+ xw.buf = xw.win;
XSetForeground(xw.dpy, dc.gc, dc.col[defaultbg].pixel);
XFillRectangle(xw.dpy, xw.buf, dc.gc, 0, 0, win.w, win.h);
@@ -1386,8 +1381,6 @@ void
draw(void)
@@ -1632,8 +1627,6 @@ xdrawline(Line line, int x1, int y1, int x2)
void
xfinishdraw(void)
{
drawregion(0, 0, term.col, term.row);
- XCopyArea(xw.dpy, xw.buf, xw.win, dc.gc, 0, 0, win.w,
- win.h, 0, 0);
XSetForeground(xw.dpy, dc.gc,
dc.col[IS_SET(MODE_REVERSE)?
defaultfg : defaultbg].pixel);
## BadLength X error in Xft when trying to render emoji
Xft makes st crash when rendering color emojis with the following error:

View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
Similar to [dwm-flexipatch](https://github.com/bakkeby/dwm-flexipatch) this st 0.8.3 (3c8b75, 2020-05-20) project has a different take on st patching. It uses preprocessor directives to decide whether or not to include a patch during build time. Essentially this means that this build, for better or worse, contains both the patched _and_ the original code. The aim being that you can select which patches to include and the build will contain that code and nothing more.
Similar to [dwm-flexipatch](https://github.com/bakkeby/dwm-flexipatch) this st 0.8.3 (249ef9, 2020-06-01) project has a different take on st patching. It uses preprocessor directives to decide whether or not to include a patch during build time. Essentially this means that this build, for better or worse, contains both the patched _and_ the original code. The aim being that you can select which patches to include and the build will contain that code and nothing more.
For example to include the `alpha` patch then you would only need to flip this setting from 0 to 1 in [patches.h](https://github.com/bakkeby/st-flexipatch/blob/master/patches.def.h):
```c
@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ Refer to [https://st.suckless.org/](https://st.suckless.org/) for details on the
### Changelog:
2020-06-10 - Upgrade to 249ef9, 2020-06-01
2020-06-05 - Added the ligatures patch
2020-05-20 - Upgrade to 222876, 2020-05-09, and removed visualbell 1, 2, 3 patches and force redraw after keypress due to incompatibility. Refer to tag [371878](https://github.com/bakkeby/st-flexipatch/tree/371878) if you want to try these out.